I'd read/heard many accolades for Acronis on various sites/
NG's. That's why I was quite surprised at the Amazon criti-
cism's. I've actually been very happy with Ntbackup, despite
what other's may say. I guess that's an accurate example of
the non-glowing feedback ratio you describe.

Thanks.





" db.·.. ><))) ·>` .. ." <databaseben.public.newsgroup.microsoft.com> wrote
in message news:uleVZZetIHA.1872@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> unfortunately, the
> glowing feedbacks
> from many users
> that have successfully
> used those software's
> are rarely posted.
>
> in doing so, there
> would likely be thousands
> of postings, perhaps
> millions.
>
> there is no perfect
> backup solution nor
> should you believe that
> there is one.
>
> however, an ideal solution
> would be the methodology
> you build that is perfect
> for your situation/scenario.
>
> perhaps, you might want
> to look into Microsoft's
> home server technology.
>
> if anything can be considered
> reliable enough to protect
> your operating system and
> data, it should be from the
> makers of that operating
> system.
>
> --
>
> db·´¯`·...¸><)))º>
>
> "Anonymous" <com@com.com> wrote in message
> news:CsEWj.3224$7k7.3164@flpi150.ffdc.sbc.com...
>> Any suggestions for "complete" backup/restore SW for XP
>> Pro? And that can be eventually migrated to Vista?
>>
>> I need "complete" backup/restore for data retention, image
>> recovery, boot restore, (int)(ext)ernal large HD, and (E)-
>> SATA support.
>>
>> The obvious answers, Acronis and Ghost, seem not to have
>> unanimously glowing feedback on Amazon.
>>
>> Or, are the feedback just flawed?
>>
>> Acronis:
>> http://www.amazon.com/review/product...View points=1
>>
>> Ghost:
>> http://www.amazon.com/review/product...View points=1
>>
>>
>> Thanks you very much,
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>>
>>
>