you're welcome.

--

db·´¯`·...¸><)))º>


"bm" <Darroch@aol.com> wrote in message
news:%23bIyoPq0IHA.4084@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Many thanks for the helpful advice you gave.I will now pursue more
> investigation
> Regards
> Blair
>
> " db.·.. ><))) ·>` .. ." <databaseben.public.newsgroup.microsoft.com> wrote in
> message news:eX3Naxi0IHA.4364@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> oh,
>>
>> most photo quality papers
>> can be used on all photo
>> reproducing printers.
>>
>> the packages will also
>> notate details that are
>> specific so as to
>> match the printers
>> requirements.
>>
>> so photo quality papers
>> regardless of their manufacturer
>> designed for ink jets have to
>> be used for ink jet photo
>> printers to ensure optimal
>> quality.
>>
>> it is impossible for us to
>> say which is better for
>> you because every pc has
>> a configuration that is different.
>>
>> what i "strongly" recommend
>> when you proceed with a
>> print project is to ensure that
>> your computer is "dedicated"
>> to that sole task.
>>
>> if it is not, then the computer
>> will experience interruptions
>> by services or programs installed
>> and the data output going to
>> the printer will become corrupted
>> and you will have an expensive
>> piece of photo paper with images
>> similar to a picasso.
>>
>> another tip is that the photo
>> can always be printed on
>> photo paper. then that
>> printed page can be taken
>> to a copy store specializing
>> in high quality copying.
>>
>> therefore you can maximize
>> your time and save much ink
>> and paper by taking that photo
>> to that copying store and have
>> it reproduced by high quality
>> photo copiers that can use
>> plain or textured paper.
>>
>> likewise, such store can also
>> take your usb flash with the
>> file version of the picture and
>> outputed to photo paper via
>> their computerized system.
>>
>> that being said, you might
>> want to ensure to use a
>> graphics program like
>> photo shop to ensure that
>> the raw photo taken by the camera
>> is absolutely perfect before
>> sending it to the printer or
>> out for printing.
>>
>> --
>>
>> db·´¯`·...¸><)))º>
>>
>> "bm" <Darroch@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:%23cY%23%230d0IHA.1236@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl.. .
>>> Thanks for your help. Unfortunately I live in Scotland and we don't yet have
>>> a Walmark
>>> I have experienced using Walmark on my visit to my cousin in Fayetteville,
>>> Arkansas. Wish we had one here
>>> Regards
>>> Blair
>>>
>>> " db.·.. ><))) ·>` .. ." <databaseben.public.newsgroup.microsoft.com> wrote
>>> in message news:O8p$$gM0IHA.4964@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>> use this instead:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.walmart.com/subflow/Your...art.do?login=1
>>>>
>>>> better quality, options
>>>> and price.
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> db·´¯`·...¸><)))º>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "bm" <Darroch@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:%23K9LDuezIHA.3968@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Has anyone had experience using Choice Stationary photo papers?
>>>>> I have a new Epson printer and wish to establish standards for my future
>>>>> work.
>>>>> I have two categories- the first is for high quality for a restricted
>>>>> number of prints which I assume would be better using Epson paper. This
>>>>> is expensive and not required for the remainder which are holiday and
>>>>> family snaps and I was looking at a cheaper alternative with a reasonable
>>>>> quality. I am looking for advice
>>>>> Blair
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>