Bill
I had a HP Laserjet 4L and it was a good printer. As I recall the paper
feed was from a flat tray rather than a vertical feed adopted by the 5L
and 6L successors. A flat feed is far less prone to paper jams. The
print rate would be slow by today's standards (up to 4ppm) but if speed
was not an issue it's a good workhorse. However, buying a modern
eqivalent is now a lot cheaper than when I bought my 4L.
As you said it requires a Bio-Tronics parallel interface. The model
became obsolete in 1995 and support ceased in 2000. Cartridges may be
still available but I would be surprised if parts to repair are still
obtainable.
http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport...ectID=bpl02078
I am currently awaiting delivery of an HP Laserjet P2014 Printer, which
including cartridge is costing £120 (US$240). A cartridge costs about
£50 (US$100) if bought from the right source i.e. not a big store like
Staples. The print rate is 23 ppm and the monthly duty cycle is 10,000
pages. An HP Laserjet P1005 can be bought for £58 (US$116) including
cartridge which gives 14 ppm and a monthly duty cycle of 5,000 page.
--
Regards.
Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bill in Co. wrote:
> YoKenny wrote:
>> <Bill in Co.>wrote:
>>> zirath wrote:
>>>> I've been trying to install an hp laserjet 4L. The device manager
>>>> lists lpt1 but the add printer wizard doesn't.
>>>>
>>>> The automatic printer installation fails with the error message
>>>> that there was a problem with the port.
>>>>
>>>> I created the lpt1 port using the add printer wizard and the
>>>> printer is installed
>>>> to it and functions, but each time I boot the plug and play
>>>> detection finds the printer and keeps trying to install it and
>>>> fails. Help appreciated.
>>>
>>> The HP LaserJet 4L is a parallel port printer, and you don't have a
>>> parallel port, do you? Most newer computers don't have them
>>> anymore.
>>
>> A USB to parallel adapter cable is available:
>> http://www.softchoice.com/catalog/pr...R=U94785_US_EN
>
> But I don't think he can use the "lpt1" port anymore by using that.
> He's got to have a USB driver that works with that printer, I think
> And I don't think there is such a driver available for that old model.