Windows XP Community - XPHeads



Win XP - Gateway FPD2485W vs. DELL Optiplex GX270 no max resolution

microsoft.public.windowsxp.video


Reply
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2008, 09:08 PM
HiTech RedNeck
 
Posts: n/a
Win XP - Gateway FPD2485W vs. DELL Optiplex GX270 no max resolution
Dear Windows byteheads,

I am having obstinate problems trying to get Win XP SP3 on a Dell Optiplex
GX270 containing a Dell-provided Silicon Image 8x AGP card to put out the
maximum screen resolution (1920 x 1200) to a 24" Gateway FPD2485W. Win XP
identifies it as Plug and Play Monitor, but with a DVI-D cable the max
selectable resolution is 1600 x 1200 (which displays in a distorted
horizontally elongated manner) and with a VGA cable the max working
selectable resolution is 1680 x 1050. (With VGA cable, I see 1920 x 1200
available as well, but will only let me choose 75 Hz whereas my monitor
wants 60 Hz and can't support 75 Hz. Selecting 1920 x 1200 makes the
monitor blank out and pop up a warning about wrong frequency. If I check
the "hide unsupported modes" box then I don't see 1920 x 1200 at all.)

It is NOT a hardware limitation: I can boot to Linux Kubuntu Hardy Heron on
the same system, and with either DVI-D or VGA cable, Linux immediately
recognizes the screen as 1920 x 1200 at 60 Hz and it displays nicely.

I've installed the latest 82865G video drivers from Dell (Intel Extreme
Graphics 2). Intel has archived only an older version of these drivers,
which I've also tried. Neither version seems to alleviate the problem.
Gateway's web site has no video driver support for this monitor. (Gateway
does offer a display tuning application, which in vain attempts to set the
computer to optimal display resolution, i.e. 1920 x 1200 at 60 Hz.)

I've tried monkeying around with the contents of C:\WINDOWS\INF\monitor.inf
(after backing up the original) to put in higher resolutions for the Plug
and Play monitor, but I am not totally sure that I've got everything right
in the data field formats. Nor do I know how the Gateway monitor identifies
itself to Windows so I could try to create a dedicated monitor*.inf entry
for the Gateway. (Older Gateway monitors are present in one of the
monitor*.inf files.)

The BIOS is set to allow 8 MB preallocated to video memory. This according
to Intel should be enough to allow the OS to boot up as 1600 x 1200 at 60 Hz
at 32 bits without requesting more video memory. The BIOS does not offer me
anything higher than 8 MB. It is the latest BIOS update for this machine
available from Dell. The machine itself has 1.5 gigabytes of DDR memory
installed.

If I didn't have a dedicated Windows proprietary application that I had to
run there, I would say pshaw on Windows and go with Linux so I could use my
expensive screen. But I require Windows for my application, and the
application really wants AGP with DVI-D -- it says VGA will load down the
computer too much.

Any ideas how to get any further than this, O wise ones of the web? Thank
you very mucho in advance-o.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2008, 10:25 PM
Cari \(MS-MVP\)
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Win XP - Gateway FPD2485W vs. DELL Optiplex GX270 no max resolution
Have you tried graphics drivers from the manufacturers themselves?
http://www.siliconimage.com/support/...x?pid=0&cid=0&

Gateway also have specific software for this monitor:
http://support.gateway.com/s/MONITOR...indowsXP.shtml
--
Cari (MS-MVP) Printing & Imaging
www.coribright.com/windows

"HiTech RedNeck" <hitechCOLOR-OF-BLOODneck@ameritech.net> wrote in message
news:Bb1pk.17823$cW3.15962@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com...
> Dear Windows byteheads,
>
> I am having obstinate problems trying to get Win XP SP3 on a Dell Optiplex
> GX270 containing a Dell-provided Silicon Image 8x AGP card to put out the
> maximum screen resolution (1920 x 1200) to a 24" Gateway FPD2485W. Win XP
> identifies it as Plug and Play Monitor, but with a DVI-D cable the max
> selectable resolution is 1600 x 1200 (which displays in a distorted
> horizontally elongated manner) and with a VGA cable the max working
> selectable resolution is 1680 x 1050. (With VGA cable, I see 1920 x 1200
> available as well, but will only let me choose 75 Hz whereas my monitor
> wants 60 Hz and can't support 75 Hz. Selecting 1920 x 1200 makes the
> monitor blank out and pop up a warning about wrong frequency. If I check
> the "hide unsupported modes" box then I don't see 1920 x 1200 at all.)
>
> It is NOT a hardware limitation: I can boot to Linux Kubuntu Hardy Heron
> on
> the same system, and with either DVI-D or VGA cable, Linux immediately
> recognizes the screen as 1920 x 1200 at 60 Hz and it displays nicely.
>
> I've installed the latest 82865G video drivers from Dell (Intel Extreme
> Graphics 2). Intel has archived only an older version of these drivers,
> which I've also tried. Neither version seems to alleviate the problem.
> Gateway's web site has no video driver support for this monitor. (Gateway
> does offer a display tuning application, which in vain attempts to set the
> computer to optimal display resolution, i.e. 1920 x 1200 at 60 Hz.)
>
> I've tried monkeying around with the contents of
> C:\WINDOWS\INF\monitor.inf
> (after backing up the original) to put in higher resolutions for the Plug
> and Play monitor, but I am not totally sure that I've got everything right
> in the data field formats. Nor do I know how the Gateway monitor
> identifies
> itself to Windows so I could try to create a dedicated monitor*.inf entry
> for the Gateway. (Older Gateway monitors are present in one of the
> monitor*.inf files.)
>
> The BIOS is set to allow 8 MB preallocated to video memory. This
> according
> to Intel should be enough to allow the OS to boot up as 1600 x 1200 at 60
> Hz
> at 32 bits without requesting more video memory. The BIOS does not offer
> me
> anything higher than 8 MB. It is the latest BIOS update for this machine
> available from Dell. The machine itself has 1.5 gigabytes of DDR memory
> installed.
>
> If I didn't have a dedicated Windows proprietary application that I had to
> run there, I would say pshaw on Windows and go with Linux so I could use
> my
> expensive screen. But I require Windows for my application, and the
> application really wants AGP with DVI-D -- it says VGA will load down the
> computer too much.
>
> Any ideas how to get any further than this, O wise ones of the web? Thank
> you very mucho in advance-o.
>
>


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:24 AM.


Registry Mechanic - Free Scan Now
Driver Scanner 2009 - Free Scan Now




Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin for phpBBStyles.com.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74